In an appeal against a Single Judge’s order denying an interim injunction, the Division Bench granted partial relief to Princeton University (“Appellant”) in its suit against The Vagdevi Educational Society and others (“Respondents”) from use of the PRINCETON mark in relation to any new institution during the pendency of the suit. The Single Judge had dismissed...
In an appeal against a Single Judge’s order denying an interim injunction, the Division Bench granted partial relief to Princeton University (“Appellant”) in its suit against The Vagdevi Educational Society and others (“Respondents”) from use of the PRINCETON mark in relation to any new institution during the pendency of the suit. The Single Judge had dismissed...
In a recent decision, the Delhi High Court considered an application by Honasa Consumer Limited (“Plaintiff”), proprietor of The Derma Co., seeking an interim injunction against Cloud Wellness Private Limited and its Director (“Defendants”), who market skincare products under DERMATOUCH mark with similar trade dress. The Plaintiff alleged copyright infringement and passing off, asserting that...
Recently, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court directed the Trade Marks Registry (“Registry”) to remove a trade mark registration for the mark CROOSE (Stylized), owned by JNG Footstep Private Limited (“Respondent”), based on a cancellation petition filed by Crocs Inc. (“Petitioner”), based on its rights in the mark CROCS. It is the Petitioner’s case that its...
Recently, the Delhi High Court dismissed the application filed by Dayal Industries Private Limited (“Defendant”), seeking permission to file a rectification petition against M/s Gopika Industries’ (“Plaintiff”) registered mark DYAL. The Plaintiff filed a suit, inter alia, alleging that its mark DYAL in Class 31 (dated April 4, 1996) has been infringed by the Defendant....
The Supreme Court, in an appeal filed by Novenco Building and Industry A/S (“Novenco”) against the judgements passed by the Division Bench and Single Judge of the Himachal Pradesh High Court in favour of Xero Energy Engineering Solutions Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. (“Xero Energy”), held that in cases involving continuous infringement of intellectual property rights,...
The Delhi High Court recently decided a rectification petition filed by Ardo Medical AG, seeking cancellation of the trade mark ARDO Device, subject of Registration No. 4578111, in Class 44, in the name of M/s. SDB International. The petitioner, Ardo Medical AG, a Swiss company, engaged in development, production, and distribution of products for premature...
Recently, the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, dismissed a plea filed by Suparshva Swabs India (“Appellant”), the manufacturer of cotton buds and hygiene products, seeking, inter alia, a decree of permanent injunction restraining AGN International & Ors. (“Respondents”) from using the mark TULIP or AGN TULIP in relation to perfumes, cosmetics, and allied goods, on...
In a recent order, the Delhi High Court granted ex parte interim relief in a trademark dispute filed by Novalife Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. (“Plaintiff”) against Mr. Bharat Sachdeva and his associated concerns Novvalife Karnal and Novvalife Sri Ganganagar (“Defendants”), concerning the use of the mark NOVVALIFE, which is deceptively similar to the Plaintiff’s registered mark...
The Delhi High Court has, in a recent case, restrained Patanjali Ayurved Limited (“Patanjali”) from broadcasting a disparaging advertisement in a suit filed by Dabur India Limited (“Dabur”). Recently, Dabur came across an advertisement by Patanjali where it portrayed all Chyawanprash products as “dhoka” (deception) and implied that only Patanjali’s own Patanjali Special Chyawanprash represented...
© 2026 Created with Royal Elementor Addons
