Category: Updates from Courts & Registry

  • All Posts
  • Global Insights
  • Other Updates
  • Stance
  • Updates
  • Updates from Courts & Registry

May 11, 2026

Recently, a two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court allowed an appeal filed by Lotus Herbals Private Limited (“Lotus Herbal”) against an order passed by the Ld. Single Judge of the Delhi High Court and granted an interim injunction against DPKA Universal Consumer Ventures Private Limited (“DPKA”) restraining it from using the LOTUS SPLASH and...

May 11, 2026

The Delhi High Court’s Division Bench in Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG v. Controller of Patents has delivered a significant ruling on the architecture of revocation under the Patents Act, 1970, in the context of IN 243301 covering Linagliptin. The decision addresses how Section 64 revocation interacts with Section 107 invalidity defences and with the...

May 11, 2026

Recently, the Bombay High Court vacated an ex-parte ad-interim injunction obtained by Elder Prrojects Limited (“Plaintiff”) against Elder Neutraciticals Private Limited (“Defendant”) and dismissed the Plaintiff’s application for temporary injunction, after finding gross suppression of material facts.   The Plaintiff claimed to have coined and used the ELDER device mark since 1992-93 for pharmaceutical products...

May 11, 2026

Recently, the High Court of Delhi, directed the Registrar of Copyrights to remove the copyright registration obtained by Vijay Keshav Wagh (“Respondent”) for the artistic work titled “SHREE SAKSHAT” since it copied the TIGER beer logo owned by Heineken Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. (“Petitioner”).   It was the Petitioner’s case that the Respondent’s artistic work...

May 11, 2026

In Communication Components Antenna Inc. v. Rosenberger / PROSE, the Delhi High Court did much more than find a telecom patent valid and infringed. It showed how far an Indian court is willing to go when a whole group is pushing a patented technology into the market and it delivered a powerful message on how Indian...

May 11, 2026

The Calcutta High Court’s decision in Reckitt Benckiser v. Godrej gives an important reminder: a company cannot use branding law to keep a monopoly over a bottle shape after its design protection has run out. Reckitt Benckiser, known for its widely recognized Harpic toilet cleaner, had earlier secured design protection over its distinctive “duck neck” bottle. This...

Load More

End of Content.

Blog Category

Trending Posts

  • All Posts
  • Global Insights
  • Other Updates
  • Stance
  • Updates
  • Updates from Courts & Registry

Blog Tag

    Unlock Exclusive Beauty Secrets & Glam Moments!

    Join our beauty circle and be the first to discover new arrivals, limited-edition collections, expert tips, and special offers created just for our subscribers.

    You have been successfully Subscribed! Ops! Something went wrong, please try again.

    About

    Our Story

    Ingredients

    Sustainability

    Reviews

    Press

    Careers

    Beauty Resources

    Beauty Blog

    Skincare Guide

    Shade Finder

    Tutorials

    Loyalty Program

    Promotions

    Customer Care

    FAQs

    Shipping Policy

    Returns & Exchanges

    Track Order

    Privacy Policy

    Terms & Conditions

    Beauty Resources

    Beauty Blog

    Skincare Guide

    Shade Finder

    Tutorials

    Loyalty Program

    Promotions

    Customer Care

    FAQs

    Shipping Policy

    Returns & Exchanges

    Track Order

    Privacy Policy

    Terms & Conditions